Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Potentially Insulting Study (deal with it!)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals.atheists.sex.intelligence/index.html?on.cnn=1

I mentioned this study last class period when something came up about IQ and observations of the consequences of your actions and how they fit into a set of moral rules.

I know that such studies are hard to find to be accurate given that any number of bias and improper methods may have been used, but it is still interesting..

What I took from it is, what I posted on my facebook account... (of course I have to apply some censoring here as not to outcast the entire class... even if they may deserve it lol...)

"

I was particularly amused at how religious people are dumber than athiests... SUCK IT *****. BUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA --- they waste too much time on lulz instead of fact.. I'm going to say.. 'pwnd'

On the other side, didn't care for "vegetarianism" being associated with smarter people.. I like my steak ;_;

And lastly.. "smarter folks don't have more children"... which brings about some questions/observations!
1) Our species is dumb because the smart aren't compensating for the morons that have sex and get pregnant (lack of protection, etc).
2) Stupid people have more sex (Oh wait.. I knew this one)
3) The future of our race is screwed... this is what happens when you stop Asians from breeding, they may be overpopulated, but they're the smartest race around. :/

"

Of course the aim of this post is to reiterate better what I was trying to say in class (too many people talking too much to get a word in! we should double the class period length!) -- many people may make an observation of their surroundings, make a decision, and stick to it without thinking.. this is often a pure built-in response, built upon someone else's moral code (say a history book like the bible (or other such religious texts).

Then there are the folks that think for a moment about the consequences of their action, not just from a perspective on the law of the area (if they even know it) but what they, personally, feel to be right and wrong (something blind followers of a religious text can never understand or do themselves without tossing said text out the window). To me, this ability to think out the consequences, perform reason, and go on personal feelings of right and wrong show a definite superior intellect as they must exercise their brains to perform the action rather than blindly act from someone else's teachings. Clearly, this study could back that, even if it was not the overall mindset of the examiners.

Then there are those that don't think before they partake in sexual deviance (anything relating to intercourse before proper marriage/bonding/mating has been established/performed). Obviously our society has the idiotic impression they can teach kids to follow the rule of abstinence.. but since the human race is inherently curious, it doesn't work. In Europe, however, they teach about protection and then have less issues in the matter altogether. But, back to the 'thinking' aspect... kids (and even adults) get so worked up in the moment and are completely unable to think with hormones destroying their mental processes, that protection is rarely used even then because they're too busy rushing into things instead of doing such a simple action as thinking.

Now of course, many might mention that many religions (I only know of Mormonism) that tell you not to have sex before marriage.. and sure it's a good policy, but the male and their raging uncontrollable hormones during their peak mating years doesn't allow for them to think before they act. The same then applies to females during that wonderful week in the monthly cycle of hell. However, for the individuals that are a bit smarter and are able to establish control over themselves (think "mind over matter" from whomever that philosopher was) they can use protection, and as I stated above.. this means the smart people use more protection, have less kids, and thus don't populate as much as the dumb ones that have kids from lack of protection and ridiculous moronic laws that prevent abortion; because for some reason.. letting idiots cause even more overpopulation from their carelessness is somehow a good thing in our society.. who woulda guessed!

There is no way for anyone to define the right or wrongs of intercourse.. not even some religious texts, as they're all, in the end, just guidelines. However, it is the wiser person that can look at their situation, see what is needed, evaluate, and perform within their own established parameters.

That's really about all I gathered from this survey, even if it wasn't directly stated. I don't have any idea's on the vegetarianism bit of it.. as we are omnivores...

6 comments:

  1. Oh I guess I should mention this as well::

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/23/brizendine.male.brain/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have you ever seen the movie Idiocracy? It's pretty much a worst case scenario where stupid people take over the world because smart people didn't reproduce. The government is faced with a famine because they water plants with Gatorade.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds like my kinda movie.. I'll check into it, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nooooo! Not Idiocracy! That was a waste of ninety-some odd minutes that I'll never get back...*sob*

    ReplyDelete
  5. Vegetarianism seems to fit perfectly with the correlation of intelligence and considered actions. With both religeon and sex the observation seems to be that those who stop and think before acting are more intelligent. When it comes to vegetarianism this same principle is applied to diet. In my experience, observation, and reading, proper vegetarian or (especially) vegan nutrition (not just pasta/steamed veggies!) is more difficult than "normal" diets. Basically, being an omnivore on a vegetarian diet takes effort. This leads to more thought being put towards meals, similar to more decisions for the religous.
    Something else that I think of when considering this survey is correlation/causation and self-reinforcing patterns. Are the less intelligent attracted to (for example) religeon, or does religeon make people less intelligent? Are both true (a self-reinforcing pattern where a lesser degree of intelligence brings one to something which makes one less intelligent, leading to more similar decisions)?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow.. that reminded me of 'mob mentality', Ian.

    ReplyDelete